No. 22-5404
Charles Anthony Walker, Jr. v. United States
IFP
Tags: abduction abduction-definition circuit-split criminal-law criminal-procedure fourth-circuit hobbs-act robbery sentencing-enhancement sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation united-states-sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-11-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether movement of an employee within the confines of a store qualifies as abduction under U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(4)(A)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented is: (1) Whether movement of an employee within the confines of a store qualifies as abduction under U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(4)(A)
Docket Entries
2022-11-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/18/2022.
2022-10-19
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2022-09-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 19, 2022.
2022-09-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 19, 2022 to October 19, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-08-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 19, 2022)
Attorneys
Charles Anthony Walker
Thomas Kieran Maher Jr. — Law Offices of Amos Tyndall, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent