Whether the Supreme Court's holding in Gonzalez v. Crosby controls and must be followed by respondents

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. WHETHER THE HIGH QOURT'S HOLDING IN GONZALEZ VS. CROSBY, 545 U.S. 524,528,125 S.Ct. 2641,162 L.Bd.2d 480 (2005) CONTROLS AND IS MANDATED TO BE FOLLOWED BY RESPONDENTS? 2. WHETHER A 60(b) MOTION FOR RELIEF OF JUDGMENT IS THE PROPER VEHICLE TO SEEX RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT, RE-OPEN CASE AND REINSTATE APPELLATE JURISDICTION? 3. WHETHER RESPONDENTS’ FAILURE TO EVEN: ENTERTAIN AND/OR — ADJUDICATE THE 60(b) MOTION CONFLICT WITH ITS OWN PRIOR RULINGS AND NOT IN HARMONY WITH INTERPRETATIONS FROM UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT PRECEDENT? 4. WHETHER ISSUANCE OF A WRIT OF MANDAMUS THE ONLY REMEDY AVAILABLE TO CORRECT THIS ABUSE OF DISCRETION THAT RESULTED IN A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE? 5. WHETHER PETITIONER'S ACCESS TO THE COURTS WAS IMPEDED? . i