Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment

ESTION PRESENTED WHETHER THE STRTE CovkT OF MZCHIGAA GAVE DUE RELOGNITZOA TO PETZ TZONER'S FEDERAL CLALIA AFTER A JURY FOVID PETITIONER ACTUAL ZNNOCENT LIs7 OF PARTIES forsuan +o Supreme Cowl Rule 14.) (hb), be. fet itionen Jama) 4. Bewman Lerdifies that the names of ai) poties to dhis proceedings/ Certioriari appears in the Caption of this fetitjon for Wrt of Cevtionian. it TABLE OF CONTENT S$ QVESTZON PRESENTED . . . , . oe 4257 BF PARTIES TO PRBCEEDIZAIG PURSUANT T6 RULES /4.1 Cb) |. . . : . . TABLE OF AUTHORITTZES . a < . ‘ REPORTED DECZSIONS. . . . . ‘ . . STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION. . . . LONSTZLTUTIONAL PROVISIONS AtiDb STATUBES ZAVOLVED . . . | STATEMENT DF THE CASE. . . . : o 8 « . SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT. « 6 ° . ‘ ee so. REASOA FOR GRANTING THE whit. , . . 2 LONCLOSION . . . . : . . . . . « EXHLEBITS . . . . Re, APPENDZX . . . : /