No. 22-5420

Lawrence E. Mattison v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-08-22
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 4th-circuit civil-rights due-process fourth-circuit habeas-corpus judicial-procedure writ-of-error
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2022-10-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals made an error of Law when is failed to protect the 14th Amendment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED | | Plaintiff presented case precedent to the 4» Circuit court of Appeals which called | for the 4* circuit to protect the Federal 14s Amendment. Case Law was presented | which proves that conversion of a Petition for Habeas corpus into a Petition for Writ | of error coram non judice against the Virginia Supreme court is appropriate. | Plaintiff presented case Law which proved that protecting the 14» Amendment is | | far more important than the rules governing 28 USC§2254 petitions. THE QUESTION(s) are: , 1. Whether the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals made an error of Law when is | failed to protect the 14th Amendment. | 2. Whether the 4th Circuit contradicted its own authority when converting Petitioner’s respondent from the “Commonwealth of Virginia”. 8. Whether the 4th circuit contradicted its own authority when failing to give notice of their intent to convert giving petitioner time to amend or | withdrawal. i RELATED CASES Lawrence Mattison v. Commonwealth of Virginia, U.S. S. Ct. case No. 17-8868 Lawrence Mattison v. Bob McCabe (former Superintendent) Va. case No. 161511

Docket Entries

2022-10-11
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2022-09-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
2022-09-09
Waiver of right of respondent Harold Clarke to respond filed.
2022-08-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 21, 2022)

Attorneys

Harold Clarke
Andrew Nathan FergusonOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent
Lawrence Mattison
Lawrence E. Mattison — Petitioner