No. 22-5424
Jesus Miguel Arreola-Ochoa v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: None
Latest Conference:
2022-12-02
(distributed 2 times)
Question presented not available.
Docket Entries
2022-12-05
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/2/2022.
2022-11-04
Petitioner complied with order of October 17, 2022
2022-10-17
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until November 7, 2022, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2022-09-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/14/2022.
2022-09-22
Waiver of right of respondent Garland, Att'y Gen. to respond filed.
2022-08-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 22, 2022)
2022-08-15
Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.
Attorneys
Garland, Att'y Gen.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Jesus Miguel Arreola-Ochoa
Alexander Edward Budzenski — Alexander E Budzenski, Petitioner