Should-removal-from-state-court-to-federal-court-be-allowed-only-after-state-court-hearing

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Should removal from a state court to a federal court by a defendant only be allowed after the state court judge conducts a hearing to determine if the case is a state issue, federal issue, or both and remove the case if warranted? 2. If a case is removed to a Federal court, should it only be removed to an Article III court? 3. If a plaintiff has been declared or sanctioned as a vexatious litigant and the ruling, he was sanctioned under is either unconstitutional and/or the new rules on vexatious litigant in the second question would not make the plaintiff a vexatious litigant, should the vexatious litigant sanction be vacated as well as any related orders on other cases? 4, If a Court denies a legal in forma pauperis motion and declares the motion as frivolous based on another panel’s ruling involving another courts unconstitutional vexatious litigant order, can the courts pile on sanction fees to a total of over $5000 when the Appellant only had a surplus of . $2.00 per month at the time? | | | iii II