No. 22-5427

Jade Christian Nichols v. United States

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-08-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: controlled-substance criminal-procedure federal-law federal-sentencing preemption sentencing-guidelines state-law statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-10-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a state definition of 'controlled substance' control a federal sentencing enhancement under the Sentencing Guidelines, when the state lists substances that are not federally controlled?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Question Presented for Review Expressed in the Terms and Circumstances of the Case. Does a state definition of “controlled substance” control a federal sentencing enhancement under the Sentencing Guidelines, when the state lists substances that are not federally controlled? 2 (b) List of all

Docket Entries

2022-10-11
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
2022-09-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2022-08-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 22, 2022)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixAppendixAppendixProof of ServiceMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetition

Attorneys

Jade Christian Nichols
Kyle Edward Wackenheim — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent