No. 22-5432
Tags: actual-innocence constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidentiary-development habeas-corpus jury-trial jury-verdict state-courts
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess Punishment HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-10-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a state court must allow evidentiary development of actual innocence claims and assess the totality of the case
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether, when deciding if it should allow a defendant an opportunity to present evidence of actual innocence, a state court must, in conformance with the requirements of the due process clause, at a minimum, allow evidentiary development of claims that, as pled, reasonably establish a likelihood of a different result on retrial and assess the totality of the case, particularly where, as here, more than one jury struggled with reaching a guilty verdict in the case at hand. i
Docket Entries
2022-10-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.
2022-09-22
Brief of respondent Florida in opposition filed.
2022-08-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 22, 2022)
Attorneys
State of Florida
Carolyn M. Snurkowski — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Carolyn M. Snurkowski — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Terence Valentine
Marie-Louise Samuels Parmer — Samuels Parmer Law, P.A., Petitioner
Marie-Louise Samuels Parmer — Samuels Parmer Law, P.A., Petitioner