No. 22-5433

Tedd Wilson v. State Farm General Insurance Company

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2022-08-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights district-court due-process insurance insurance-dispute legal-standing procedural-challenge standing summary-judgment takings
Key Terms:
Environmental
Latest Conference: 2023-01-06 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant insurance company

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : | | 7 F-Uf-Q2 | _ QvecTrane GresewteQ | | The De [eic OT Deewlon) To grant Summary Je&emeay ; I Direa \Y Con bbc wi A Ore OQ uling $y he Supreme Coot = S U FI. Af ABY A he nh farms jag tf bosT. _™s (? (TMOSS Cia iy be Cove. ihe (Lucd xb Noli a Pook In Orem tome st Farm Laying To AO pol Awlwey Pp ‘y ( afl. A hao AS (roids C Lnim _ HUas BO VernA AWCO Dees Av _ Ais ws. The AS OCface Comp hy iS Dewy omy CAI mM = _ ing STANDING eASe [AY ; Wei Rey Diiiysanice Compares ee gci_os 378 lf 72 VOoTtay < gvlre alder trom | UN Scrvgolous inSurndce Companies kK + ; oo | OF in ons Selow — . | BecAuse The DisrTnc] onl | lErroNeoush rpntte?_ Sommez ITuWoe mea icf MS low 3 | Ke cans dex , The msTion Wad | avetmighted on phe ZETh Lay |G 7 9st ‘Te e Cour A Rew | Lay Spninlier Thhw fle Vilar me. ~ | | DusTcl. cava” g(AnikD me AN Lextterstian pewese mM ‘Ther | (AED AWAY on MATCH AT, 202 ~ _ | heve eve katie oA GJ Cong | | A 1 AN yMAmMeDute Member of INoon Family “wal fe yt LAN eytensnon MW Wels — | | lccfher The DUTMT ont OK« phe Th citcit ever eure? me LAN extention = . St. Farm os Toying To SAY Rea STinn To feblusiPen waAl . Lun Tone! tahen 1 ams ATL — ‘ | e) (C [jon , ‘ ON oClYobea Z S3(D © O , . Ke hean iV Anth lf Zo Ad . |The MTh cine; Le 1eQ mn Appeal, En bawK, Saying 7 an ce Toe lowed | he (Aw tr) Wart Caw * Con Ld They De _ u/e Specie icil Apve One Q vattra Te WA SC farm Tee Crm fh ~ He CaimWhal KnQ oF mdurpece AkKei The Cong“The Whole Time wk [has Wwe They wold fay Tle Claw 6 walt fT me Kaw (F |Th we Were Pry Qrablein {~ | Because Uintage Baveball cao | hAve geno op im VAasve , L can \ No Ceayv *ePCace my cans for | The 60 Mole CmiNin Fret i Ae Chen! = Co Wold covT Ouch 700,000 To feplace Te Day hu) The Dambse, JT ams Du haw TY (tA) CAuseo mae ( STAle meal o& CAs ‘ he STAT caokT Saw The : Che AvoS My &IE | The Ale 4S Cv ClhepAt ~ . : | Q) UpluA Bley tn The_: A ait hile TH clin _phe The cAb ta. WAL net, Fel MN Jul ABle nice "A hcvre CA; href “Burned” ne TApe — | C Ev ALY he Ape | | theve WAL A tAmMern in The ( CAB — AD hows Cons cjaw nest OF Qol OW he PAY ak The CAb omgeay — antinue “Ts omy Thuy mnboemiklon Ww hea totiTimy To he Cutt — ~ farm Rc Ryd To Gay my claim: Pr Apc Me tah 4 wll SeAnr Te O Po am Unk er On = ST. Fam hap No wiley Tow oF , Eve PAY ay f~ clam 2 Kept y = = CcMea| Se (Sf AAre oF % li hid Jar | be & SE he f fol 1 0/ ~ Al va a4 AACS A. Y fc tVour cCnime AcTrry! by fe trey | _ | Soins Yaort Aliy g Taking | Af Memos a. LIne he T hes 2 Lio hue ane They @CayTi Ttiy Js Deny TO x eT _ | STatemeatl of CAfe A[ tone imp TAs wee ST fram Tol me several Time P fete 10 — The he onl beng” i” aD Te me thet wh Trvl| the (onstumen prs Teo Bw Arc The Worl in Tom ANG! ay ; ALA Samp Dye hpve pf FAIL Clym AClLAJ Dow GFllrw OL Compa TAr siete Afru perl Sega fee tun pad UaPea [The Alicy holder. le. ns] [~one CA ten | ke fea in he CAVT , JtR 980 Ap ath _ LAwarry — Nw T “our = So Ths JS why ST Ferm has ‘No Feat Ae Coop cil rule | ST. Fiem _it_otl af GQatal| iT Cork AT Theve behwuinn In _tny _CApSeee , orhel Kno. hef tar’ Cheg] a a fol halden L Ooal Be | Rel 0 Attoun Able in AlwoAmpi i. Reale Fox Granting (PET Tio _ farm fas Deen Cod} Kt Eribm PR Judae [ Clint -~ (PA p> fA QO tlie” Dollar Sette meal cn Sep. Rolf . 0 Avorn PAYG Pp Billion o/lar dus Jevd. a Being Trirech oK KIC | |The! (Acketeening— CrKe_ yuu ChArce The mAaQs— | Te The Avernse Pervfsn wars Cou sk Nar Lin n “T doe cy Would 8 Du A A A ine __ hoy 250 million Dollncr Fine hBy Done ASThx o ChANGe Shere belnUnn: . ST; Farm Attoracy tjho oS VC 4a [{o Gu nw Binmucham A Coen ced origiwAl Atterne Ws] ALA LS mM AJe ~ The FBI needy To emigate thy ATI AWA Al Ss CIA) Abel = Greveul Aay «The Attoz ac iN . ALABAMA From Talking Mm CASE — (Vo matter how och ANY ATO te | (A \ AC oe oe ete a aa Co . (eh Sans Foi An ing (ar 2 ond nm © [lon 0 £e Cons iden (Ee Se c CMe (aw The € JuckG 2 19Nevcd —~ Plows SecT_ in | A Vv Frm paw Attornc A bss Pa UND bs The (AmingTee AC: ; AiwYer

Docket Entries

2023-01-09
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-12-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-11-29
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-11-07
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/4/2022.
2022-10-18
Reply of petitioner Tedd Wilson filed.
2022-10-06
Brief of respondent State Farm General Insurance Company in opposition filed.
2022-09-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 21, 2022.
2022-08-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 22, 2022 to October 21, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-06-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 22, 2022)

Attorneys

State Farm General Insurance Company
Aziz David FawalButler Snow, LLP, Respondent
Aziz David FawalButler Snow, LLP, Respondent
Tedd Wilson
Tedd Wilson — Petitioner
Tedd Wilson — Petitioner