No. 22-5434
Zane D. Crowder v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Tags: actual-innocence child-protection forensic-interview gateway-standard habeas-corpus impeachment-evidence mcquiggin-v-perkins new-evidence post-conviction-relief procedural-limitations
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-10-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the new evidence relied upon by the Petitioner meets the gateway actual innocence standard set forth in McQuiggin v. Perkins
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the new evidence relied upon by the Petitioner — which admittedly is impeachment evidence — meets the gateway actual innocence standard set forth in McQuiggin v. Perkins, 569 U.S. 383 (20138). il B. PARTIES INVOLVED The parties involved are identified in the style of the case. iii
Docket Entries
2022-10-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.
2022-08-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 22, 2022)
2022-06-28
Application (21A866) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until August 19, 2022.
2022-06-21
Application (21A866) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 20, 2022 to August 19, 2022, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Zane D. Crowder
Michael Robert Ufferman — Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner
Michael Robert Ufferman — Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner