No. 22-5442

Powell Jones, Jr. v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-08-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: ake-v-oklahoma certificate-of-appealability civil-procedure due-process due-process-expert expert-witness fifth-circuit-appeal ineffective-assistance standing strickland-standard strickland-v-washington
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2022-10-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

did-the-panel-of-the-fifth-circuit-err-by-deciding-the-merit-of-an-appeal-not-properly-before-the-court-to-justify-the-denial-of-a-certificate-of-appealanility

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. Did the panel of the'Fifth Circuit err by deciding the merit of an appeal not properly before the Court to justify the denial of a certificate of appealanility? II. Has the Sypreme Court overruled Strickland v. Washingyon, which held that counsel has a duty to make reasonable investigations or to make a reasonable decision that makes particular investigation unnecessary? III. Does the Supreme Court decision in Ake v. Oklahoma, that due process may require the appointment of an expert, not apply when trial counsel's error results in the denial of a motion for appointment of an expert witness, although the trial court did determine during proceedings that a technical medical issue was in fact a significant factor in the case? | i

Docket Entries

2022-10-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.
2022-06-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 23, 2022)

Attorneys

Powell Jones
Powell Jones — Petitioner
Powell Jones — Petitioner