Whether the 'imminent danger' of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) apply to the time suit was filed or during any later review of the case

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Reason for_Question #4 Theve extet a CouFleet Anoug United States Civeust Couwts On whether tne Tmmevnent Danger oF a8 U.s.c, 8 1215 GY aPPly to at the time Suit was Ff heal ox during any latev Veveew of the case. Aneol the thin Clreuit Presently chouged From Ts Priov holdings OF Tmminent Pauger At The The Suit Was Filed To “Currently unoley Tmvtinent Danger ak APPellate peview. QUESTION #4 . LS Prove oF EMMINENT DANGER AY THE The TENE Suit was Filed Relevant Duving APPellate Review OF 2@ U.S.C. & wis) 2 Reason For Questioy #2 . PettHovey Gave Full Notice To ResPondents That He is Lilegatly Detained As choPter 443.325 Florida Statute Rete achve Criminal DNA Datobase Statute Vislates ALL U.S. Su Pye yee. cottvt Prestclence Cencewvlug The Ex Poot Fadtoy Laws of The Unt Feel States Constitict fon 5 Which Mace Petitroner’s mm -carcevativn A Miscavratge of Tusttee. QUESTION + 2 Can A Miscavriage OF Justice Case OF Illegal Tucarvceration Be Dismissed Unoer The Three StviekS Law OF 28 U.S.C. § 1415 (a) ? : QUESTION + 3 Can A State Retroactively APPly A ComPleted Burglavy Conviction To An Amendeol DNA Database Statute Without Violating The EX Post Factor Prohi bition °