No. 22-5453

Hugo F. Marquez v. Brandon Kelly, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-08-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability criminal-procedure cross-examination due-process evidence ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel interview-tapes right-to-confrontation sex-abuse-case sex-crimes trial-procedure
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should the Ninth Circuit have denied Marquez's motion for a certificate of appealability on the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Should the Ninth Circuit have denied Marquez’s motion for a certificate of appealability on the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel, where trial counsel failed to timely object to the introduction of two interview tapes of a minor complainant in a sex abuse case on the grounds that the state did not intend to call the interviewer, Kimberly Goldstien, LCSW, to testify, leading to the playing of the tapes for the jury without any opportunity for the defense to cross examine Ms. Goldstien about her interview techniques and the complainant’s expanding accusations against Mr. Marquez, all to Mr. Marquez’s prejudice. ii

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-09-06
Waiver of right of respondent Brandon Kelly to respond filed.
2022-08-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 28, 2022)

Attorneys

Brandon Kelly
Benjamin Noah GutmanOregon Department of Justice, Respondent
Benjamin Noah GutmanOregon Department of Justice, Respondent
Hugo Marquez
James F. HalleyJames F. Halley, P.C., Petitioner
James F. HalleyJames F. Halley, P.C., Petitioner