No. 22-5455
Tyrone Woolaston v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-split civil-rights confidential-informant criminal-defense criminal-procedure due-process government-conduct government-misconduct manufactured-venue venue venue-manipulation
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-10-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether manufactured venue is a valid criminal defense
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether manufactured venue is a valid criminal defense that a defendant is entitled to present to a jury when it is undisputed that the Government transported a confidential informant across State lines to a favored, neighboring district to orchestrate minor and unnecessary communications with the defendant’s alleged co-conspirator for the express and sole purpose of establishing venue in the Government’s preferred, neighboring district. (D)
Docket Entries
2022-10-11
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
2022-09-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-08-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 6, 2022)
Attorneys
Tyrone Woolaston
Christopher Lavigne — Shearman & Sterling LLP, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent