No. 22-5455

Tyrone Woolaston v. United States

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2022-09-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-split civil-rights confidential-informant criminal-defense criminal-procedure due-process government-conduct government-misconduct manufactured-venue venue venue-manipulation
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-10-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether manufactured venue is a valid criminal defense

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether manufactured venue is a valid criminal defense that a defendant is entitled to present to a jury when it is undisputed that the Government transported a confidential informant across State lines to a favored, neighboring district to orchestrate minor and unnecessary communications with the defendant’s alleged co-conspirator for the express and sole purpose of establishing venue in the Government’s preferred, neighboring district. (D)

Docket Entries

2022-10-11
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
2022-09-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-08-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 6, 2022)

Attorneys

Tyrone Woolaston
Christopher LavigneShearman & Sterling LLP, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent