Antonio B. Moore v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
FourthAmendment DueProcess
Did the Chief Deputy District Clerk err in excepting the search warrant and return without a prior stamp file on its-face and then file it into the appellate record?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED * Did the Chief Deputy District Clerk ERR in excepting the search warrant and return without a prior stamp file on its-face and then file it into the appellate record? * Did the STH Circuit, ERR in the ruling that Moore did not show a denial of a Constitutional Right under the 6th Amendment to ineffectiveness of Counsel when Counsel failed to’adequately suppress the admission of State's evidence without a search warrant and return ever being a part of the filings in the trial court? * In light of this newly discovered evidence search warrant and return provided by the State, 5 years later; did it deny Moore's 4th, 6th, and 14th Amendment rights to the Constitution; thereby tainting Moore's Habeas Corpus proceedings?