Whether the Judiciary Act of 1789 and the inherent authority of federal courts to control their own proceedings sanctions a federal court's dismissal of a case based on the court's disagreement with the foreign policy positions of the United States government

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Od the J gp Cee t cdevact ’ 250 tt, , Peon the rccerted’ Ne USVAl COvRSE ot Judie / Peoceed ile. ye And theteby SANCEIOM SUCK) A dé PRLOLE by A fowlG covet when ele Chat clene Ald colvitle slo Bidens (it the foe of Tend Tea dseesPts) of of ACEO S peosecutoeis || uiistosduct (iu Che tee of Se bsti Gilly MAlets4 | tibetcated ti fee eviclelog) Ad cb ake 4 “substantie | shoutine of 4 denied ofa Coustbaticnal , Licht” thet *& calls toc Mi eXetese the Gels SUL soe Pousel, rib Chal Che Covet must ot hel Afea Che Pemeieles of sapuev ZU atds, 360 AS 264; voted v. Holohass, 2740S. 108; Aleoets V-Texas, 355 JS. 38; Ove. Lasts, 317 15,313; hited Stiles v Brcley, 73 US.667) Stillee J, eee, 587 US. 263, iMex Alia @ @ , .