No. 22-5484
Erika Perez-Garcia v. United States
Tags: appellate-review conflict-with-other-courts criminal-procedure district-court holguin-hernandez judicial-discretion sentencing-argument sentencing-guidelines substantial-arguments
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-10-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a party may obtain appellate relief when the district court fails to reference or address substantial arguments for a sentence outside the Guideline range
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether, after Holguin-Hernandez v. United States, _U.S.__, 140 S.Ct. 762 (2020), a party may obtain appellate relief when the district court fails to reference or address substantial arguments for a sentence outside the Guideline range, even if the party had not lodged a specific objection to the court’s failure to do so? Whether a district court errs should reference or address substantial arguments for a sentence outside the Guideline range? i
Docket Entries
2022-10-11
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
2022-09-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-08-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 3, 2022)
Attorneys
Erika Perez-Garcia
Kevin Joel Page — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent