No. 22-5488

Thomas James Dorn v. Verna Carpenter, Judge, District Court of Jefferson County, Colorado, et al.

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-09-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 11th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-violation due-process human-trafficking judicial-misconduct jury-trial protection-orders restraining-order standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2022-10-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should an appearance be required for a loss of rights, and should the right to trial by jury be explained to the respondent going forward in the united states for protection orders?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Should an appearance be required for a loss of rights, and should the right to trial by jury be explained to the respondent going forward in the united states for protection orders? 2. Should the mixing of state and private actors, when these private actors are not following the constitution be allowed so that actors can circumvent the established law, should the 11th amendment apply when the state involves its self? 3. Should the FBI and Jefferson County be charged with mail, hacking crimes and the crime of obstruction of justice? 4. Is the restraining protection order cruel and usual punishment? 5. Should a permeant order have been entered against me just because I was not given a reasonable amount of time to appear, should what actually happened matter? 6. Does my right to freedom of speech need to be restored since it’s a violation of the state : constitution and Judge Carpenter violated her oath? 7. Do they need to pay for damage cause by discrimination, human trafficking, discrimination with injury, a chemical weapons attack and sabotage inside and outside of their territory? 8. Should the lower courts be punished for making so many errors? 9. Should the people be allowed to file complaints against the state for acts of terror, and other wanton acts the state may carry out, should the 11th amendment apply to criminal activity? 10. The magistrate judge did not agree with the lower courts decision why has this not been taken into consideration? . 11. Should any civil unions that are not public record be vacated, if they do exist should full faith and credit apply? 12. Should full faith and credit apply to the protection order that my due processes was violated. by Page 2 of 8 STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION The jurisdiction is constitutional, subject and also personal. The federal courts are indifferent and the parties were property served and will be served also this petition. Human Trafficking is federal subject matter, so is terrorism, and so is hacking.

Docket Entries

2023-01-19
Case considered closed.
2022-10-31
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until November 21, 2022, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2022-10-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.
2022-09-30
Waiver of right of respondent City and County of Denver to respond filed.
2022-09-15
Waiver of right of respondents Verna Carpenter and Jefferson County Court to respond filed.
2022-03-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 3, 2022)

Attorneys

City and County of Denver
Geoffrey C. KlingspornDenver City Attorney's Office, Respondent
Thomas Dorn
Thomas James Dorn — Petitioner
Verna Carpenter and Jefferson County Court
Andrew David RingelHall & Evans, LLC, Respondent