No. 22-5499
Scott James Repella v. Luzerne County Children and Youth Services, et al.
IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-rights court-of-appeals due-process judicial-review legal-error procedural-challenge standard-of-review standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-11-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the court of appeals err in denying the COA and not taking into account the complexity and severity of the constitutional rights violation?
Question Presented (from Petition)
No question identified. : QUESTIONS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW | _ 1. DID THE COURT OF APPEALS ERROR IN DENYING THE COA AND NOT | TAKING INTO THE COUNT THE COMPLEXITY AND SEVERITY OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS VIOLATION? 2. IS THERE A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS VIOLATION IN QUESTION THAT WAS OVERLOOKED BY BOTH THE DISTRICT COURT AND COURT OF APPEALS? 3. SHOULD THIS COURT CONSIDER THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS VIOLATION IN QUESTION? Bn }
Docket Entries
2022-11-07
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/4/2022.
2022-07-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 3, 2022)