Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Petitioners' First Amendment rights were violated by the government's actions
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Faom are Deetoas a fF Ce Katy Lv fre 4m Zoveclirahioe on chi (tpen ~ Cher re he De tons ten Pee. ow Ge-gle Be whe ~0ea— t4h¢ 7 Devt La , : . : “ Ghe [hoe TH4 Lert CL. (Agen taco, rbene Ane they wel How De 4, “ a Mow tke Girne te fre fy hea Hor tage 7 The Gre rt 6r~ fhe Sh ge — wre Y So Lipsene Ledger Fare te De fhe paige & IAG So Gated toy oF ng Leacd F ae Lagat’ Gyo wit’ opt fore Doonr 4, ath U.S Ne eS bo “ /) dt Wedge free Coes Nerve Wonhiny FAW E, Fane! ondlens on feu Kaif Ch. Zou ocrrce [Lee Ze be oF sa 4y coe ly oF et ONY Lo % ete. He « Afag Ane Mont Ming [nent 6& Hic Lac Le C t Lrhe ra lenrltal ae Iyoe*eslren fot fo AP oer & > Lace Phecde-f Fre... 799 “
2023-01-09
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2022-12-14
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-11-16
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2022-11-07
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2022-10-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/4/2022.
2022-08-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 6, 2022)