Whether the Fifth District Court of Appeal violated the petitioner's Fourth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether The Fifth District Court Of Appeal Violated The Petitioner's Fourth, Sixth And Fourteenth Amendments Rights By Denying The Claim Of Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel For Failing To Object To The Illegal Search And Seizure In Express Or Direct Conflict With Sanchez v. State, 141 So.3d 1281 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) and State v. Raab, 920 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)? Whether The Fifth District Court Of Appeal Violated The Petitioner's Fourth, Sixth And Fourteenth Amendments Rights By Denying The Claim Of Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel For Failing To Object To The No-Knock And Announce In Express Or Direct Conflict With Benefield v. State, 160 So.2d 706 (Fla. 1964) and Soto v. State, 75 So.3d 296 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)? Whether The Fifth District Court Of Appeal Violated The Petitioner's Fourth, Sixth And Fourteenth Amendments Rights By Denying The Claim Of Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel For Failing To Object To The Fabrication Of Evidence Or Present Evidence Of The Fabrication Of Evidence In Express Or Direct Conflict With U.S. v. Stone, 960 F.2d 426, 436 (Sth Cir. 1992) and Hernandez v. State, 919 So.2d 707, 710 (Fla. Sth DCA 2006)? Whether The Fifth District Court Of Appeal Violated The Petitioner's Fourth, Sixth And Fourteenth Amendments Rights By Denying The Claim Of Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel For Failing To Object To Misstatements Or Present Any Evidence To Impeach Or Perjure State Witnesses In Direct Or Express Conflict With McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759, 90 S.Ct. 1441, 25 L-Ed.2d 763 (1970) and Lee v. State, 899 So.2d 348 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)? ‘ Whether The Fifth District Court Of Appeal Violated The Petitioner's Fourth, Sixth And Fourteenth Amendments Rights By Denying The Claim Of Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel For Failing To Diligently Investigate And Present Exculpatory Evidence In Direct Or Express Conflict With Crandell v. Bunnell, 144 F.3d 1213 (9th Cir. 1998) and Lee v. State, 899 So.2d 348 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)? Whether The Fifth District Court Of Appeal Violated The Petitioner's Fourth, Sixth And Fourteenth Amendments Rights By Denying The Claim Of Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel For Cumulative Errors And Oversights In Direct Or Express Conflict With Hurst _v. State, 18 So.3d 925, 1015 (Fla. 2009) and Campbell v. State, 247 So.3d 102 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018)? Whether The Fifth District Court Of Appeal Violated The Petitioner's Fourth, Sixth And Fourteenth Amendments Rights By Denying The Claim Of Prosecutorial Misconduct In Direct Or Expressed Conflict With Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963) and Giglio v. U.S., 405 U.S. 150, 92 S.Ct. 763, 31 L.Ed.2d 104 (1972)? Whether The Fifth District Court Of Appeal Violated The Petitioner's Fourth, Sixth And Fourteenth Amendments Rights By Denying The Claim Of Abuse Of Discretion In Direct Or Expressed Conflict With Pagan v. State, 830 So.2d 792, 806 (Fla. 2002); Salyers y. State, 920 So.2d 747 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); Nelson v. State, 274 So.2d 256, 258 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973); Carpenter v. U.S., 138 S.Ct. 2206, 201 L.Ed.2d 507 (2018); and Perez v. State, 128 So.3d 223, 226 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)?