Did the United States Supreme Court overturn its own precedent in Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191, 204 L. Ed. 2d 594 (2019)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I). Did The Uaihed States Sepceme Cooct ovecken A's OWA Precedent in Reha ve. Uarked Stabes 134.5. CH 2141, 2o4 L, BA 594 (2019): Where this Coot Aeerded on wont makes a eeiminal Conyiction Consttionclly’ valid ie 1B U.s.c $942 Cay ft 2), Did the \Neslera Distect of Wisconsia For The Severth Circort lave Dorisdichion over the pelitioner Q. a Cciminol have Joc BUS. 3 ee ry Felon in Possession of ao Firearm vadec She Predict lense . 3). Did dhe Und Shakes Coud of Nppeas | and Vhe Diskeeb Couck tte 4 rot allasia Vre peddiones to Win deous OO Vow ingly Niels Plew on Sie nee Oven ‘the pelcloner a plausible Aolence in eat of Ke x aiked Shades 1349 S. ck. 14 Qo: _L. £4 594 (oia) do to Counsel abandonment, and Condleck un Vhs mates, When Ve Serene Cork clar:bad Yo elements of $9220) % A). Pid Me ached Shks Diskd Coot abuse ; \s Avsecedion Parsvoat to 1B US.CESAZ4( ye 34242 Wn Crrminel Proceedings ia Fedb a question of Conpelenen fact ocd Louch o queshion od Compelencns arses, by ack ocdering OO Comper wd) ecaminedion bedocd om Sevrlence ex Vesol, Dees Mars Violate The Fi, dadth, and Foorleetn Amendanends of Bu Ua:red Shales Constdotion sa \odical Proceedings ¢