Whether the Court should resolve the circuit split in the wake of Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp., 544 U.S. 280 (2005) and elucidate the proper application of the 'inextricably intertwined' test in the context of the Rooker-Feldman doctrine

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Court should resolve the circuit split in the wake of Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp., 544 U.S. 280 (2005) and elucidate the proper application of the “inextricably intertwined” test in the context of the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. 2. Whether contractual terms create an exception pursuant to Lance v. Dennis, 546 U.S. 459 (2006) in which Rooker-Feldman may be applied against a party not expressly named in an earlier state proceeding. 3. Whether sua sponte transfer of intellectual property asset ownership, which was not pled, not contested, and upon which the opposing party submitted no evidence to meet its burden, deprives the Petitioner of property rights in violation of the Due Process Clause.