No. 22-553
Derek Rodgers v. United Services Automobile Association, aka USAA
Response Waived
Tags: arbitration civil-procedure duty federal-procedure federal-rules rights rule-37 sanctions spoliation-of-evidence witness-coaching
Key Terms:
Arbitration DueProcess
Arbitration DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should arbitrators have the duty and right to impose sanctions for violations of FRCP Rule 37?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW QUESTION 1: Should Arbitrators deciding a Federal case have the duty and right to impose sanctions for violations of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 37, or any other Rule? QUESTION 2: Should Arbitrators, District Courts, and Appellate Courts have the duty and right to file suit against a person discovered to be in violation of Rule 37, or any other rule? QUESTION 3: Should Witness Coaching be considered a Federal Tort Offense? QUESTION 4: Should Spoliation of Evidence be considered a Federal Tort Offense? ; i i
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-03
Waiver of right of respondent United Services Automobile Association to respond filed.
2022-10-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 17, 2023)
Attorneys
United Services Automobile Association