When is the minority legally excluded, unprotected, deprived, and/or conspired-against?

No question identified. : ee | i | QUESTIONS TO BE PRESENTED 1. When Democracy is defined as the “majority rules” does this indicate that the minority will legally be excluded, unprotected, deprived, and/or conspired-against? 2. What is “frivolous and malicious” about “Protected Citizens” speaking up for himself/herself their loved ones, and any other who may be negatively impacted by the concept the “majority rules”; especially, if they are actually of the “Protected Class’? 3. Now that homosexuals have taken over many aspects of society, especially Respondents, does this expose | the problem and result of non-compliance? 4. Just because the Petitioner is a heterosexual should this automatically exclude him from Redress of Grievances depriving him of not only his Constitutional Rights, but an honest, intelligent, rational, and judicious need for Litigation in order to address the damages sustained due to such? 5. What is more validating and affirming than answering the legal questions posed in law, and is failure to do | so a correctable error? 6. Can Respondents abridge the Constitution during the performance of their duties, because they are homosexuals and Petitioner not? , | ii |