No. 22-5533
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3582 18-usc-3582c compassionate-release criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus judicial-discretion sentencing
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-10-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court's failure to properly consider the appropriate factors pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) before denying Mr. Pinson's motion for compassionate release violated his right to due process?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT’S FAILURE TO PROPERLY CONSIDER THE APPROPRIATE FACTORS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) BEFORE DENYING MR. PINSON’S MOTION FOR COMPASSIONATE RELEASE VIOLATED HIS RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS? i INTERESTED PARTIES There are no
Docket Entries
2022-10-11
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
2022-09-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-09-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 11, 2022)
Attorneys
Dario Pinson
Robin Farnsworth — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Robin Farnsworth — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent