Did the Trial Court error by improperly restricting the Defendant's right to re-cross examination in light of new matter and evidence presented by the Prosecution during redirect and deny the Defendant the Constitutional Right to Compulsory Process of a key Government witness under the Sixth Amendment?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED TO THE COURT Argument One ; o. Did the Trial Court error by improperly restricting the Defendant's right to re-cross examination in light of new matter and evidence presented by the Prosecution during | redirect and deny the Defendant the Constitutional Right to Compulsory Process of a key Government witness under the Sixth Amendment? ° Did the Third Circuit Court of Appeals decide on important | federal questions in a way that conflicts with it's own case ; law and relevant decisions of the Supreme Court? | ° Should an Appellate Court be required to conduct a through harmless error tests on significant issues of .impact during | | a trial proceeding so as not to confine judicial review to | | a single individual, thus insuring a just review for a | criminal defendant? : | ° Was the effect of the error and continuous denials during re-cross examination so cumulative as to impose structural | error on the proceedings and impact the entirety of the | judicial process? ; | QUESTIONS PRESENTED TO THE COURT (CONTINUED) me f Argument. Two , : ° Did the Government fail to meet the standards necessary for Campaign Contribution Quid Pro Quo and/or “official action" standard? . | ° Was the decision by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in | | : conflict with that of other circuit courts and the Supreme | Court regarding an important matter of the law as it relates | ' to Federal Campaign Contribution and the First Amendment? ee