No. 22-5556
Mehmet Ali Whicker v. Washington
IFP
Tags: arbitrary-action arbitrary-and-capricious civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process extraordinary-circumstances jury-instructions legal-procedure standing state-court sua-sponte
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference:
2022-11-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court violated due process by reaching a sua sponte answer to a question not presented
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Shell the coward be oued +: y : ; J, o Lay a o SEL ary esH or by reachin ante other feet SD fo eb by woheg echog Z a] fener Viet Gye Lotirbes ct) Whicker’ rat fo At process of (wo yous Yiolsteol vuhen pue Wil Court Trash aq exkeaordnary interruption int Hu uy delbtrettions fo sukt sponte answer F queshon prt. Wee Ue never t3feo!, B.) Lieber, LO Strrenctrrunttight fo be free from acbitrary ora, capricious schon ats VPolated shen Je Hel Courd Seo} a NdtiuCtion aa fhe asdijtHed ux! ve provable ve! y 6 hater
Docket Entries
2022-11-14
Petition DENIED
2022-11-14
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/10/2022.
2022-07-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 12, 2022)