No. 22-5561
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-court appellate-review conviction due-process judicial-review napue-standard napue-v-illinois perjured-testimony perjury prosecutorial-misconduct reasonable-likelihood
Key Terms:
DueProcess Takings HabeasCorpus
DueProcess Takings HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-10-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Appellate Court of Illinois rejection of Mr. Brooks assertion of knowing use of perjured testimony to obtain a conviction had a reasonable likelihood of a different outcome
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS) PRESENTED = : oe Whether The Appellate Court of Illinois rejection of Mr. Brooks assertion of knowing use . co . ~ of perjured testimony to obtain a conviction had a reasonable likelihood ofa different outcome a was consistent with Napue v. linois, 3 ys ' a . cs, oe . ‘ a : bode un parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page, ; { ] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. Alistof. . woe . -all
Docket Entries
2022-10-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.
2022-10-06
Waiver of right of respondent Illinois to respond filed.
2022-08-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 12, 2022)
Attorneys
Illinois