No. 22-5562
Christopher Alexander v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: due-process first-step-act government-response judicial-discretion misinformation reply section-404 sentencing sentencing-variance upward-variance
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-10-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Petitioner was denied his due process rights when the district court granted his Section 404 of the First Step Act motion, but imposed upward variant sentences without allowing the Petitioner an opportunity to reply to misinformation by the Government in its response?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED , Whether Petitioner was denied his due process rights when the district court | granted his Section 404 of the First Step Act motion, but imposed upward variant sentences without allowing the Petitioner an opportunity to reply to misinformation by the Government in its response? ) | | | . | , | | ii
Docket Entries
2022-10-11
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
2022-09-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-09-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 12, 2022)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent