No. 22-5572

Takhir Ashirovich Khaytekov v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-09-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: None
Latest Conference: 2023-03-24 (distributed 2 times)

Question presented not available.

Docket Entries

2023-03-27
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/24/2023.
2023-03-08
Reply of petitioner Takhir Khaytekov filed. (Distributed)
2023-02-17
Brief of respondent Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General in opposition filed.
2023-01-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 17, 2023.
2023-01-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 18, 2023 to February 17, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-12-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including January 18, 2023.
2022-12-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 19, 2022 to January 18, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-11-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 19, 2022.
2022-11-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 18, 2022 to December 19, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-10-19
Response Requested. (Due November 18, 2022)
2022-10-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.
2022-10-11
Waiver of right of respondent Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General to respond filed.
2022-09-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 13, 2022)
2022-07-06
Application (22A13) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until September 11, 2022.
2022-06-29
Application (22A13) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 13, 2022 to September 11, 2022, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
2022-06-29
Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.

Attorneys

Garland, Merrick
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Takhir Khaytekov
David Jacob ZimmerGoodwin Procter LLP, Petitioner
David Jacob ZimmerGoodwin Procter LLP, Petitioner
Maris Joy LissGeorge P Mann and Associates, Petitioner
Maris Joy LissGeorge P Mann and Associates, Petitioner