Whether the respondent's conduct in investigating the petitioner and making allegations against her violated her constitutional rights, including her rights to privacy, due process, and equal protection

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 5 ; vs. 6 STATE OF ALASKA/ATTORNEY GENERAL 7 || RESPONDENTS 8 QUESTIONS PRESENTED 9 (1) Why did the Respondent conduct their own investigation regarding the Petitioner? 10 (2) How did the Respondent conclude that the Petitioner committed a crime on July 10,201 ; iM while the Petitioner was an ER patient at Alaska Regional Hospital? 12 (3) Why is the Respondent, Alaska Regional Hospital, Chester Gilmore (attorney for Alask 13 Regional Hospita}) accusing and making false allegations and statements against the 14 Petitioner? 15 (4) Why is the Petitioner not allowed to maintain her privacy from the Respondent 16 regarding her medical visits and ER Visits at Alaska Regional Hospital? . 17 (5) Does the Petitioner have a legal right to consult a social worker request from the 18 attending ER physician at Alaska Regional Hospital? 19 (6) Who is the Respondent contacting at Alaska Regional Hospital regarding the Petitioner 20 and her hospital visits? 21 (7) Did the Respondent violate HIPPA guidelines regarding the Petitioner after the 22 Respondent conducted their own investigation and had concluded that the Petitioner 23 had committed a crime on July 10,2018? 24 (8) Is the Respondent responsible for the Petitioner’s injuries that she had suffered from : 25 APD as APD did not conduct a thorough investigation regarding the Petitioner? 26 27 PAGE | MULLIGAN VS, STATE OF ALASKA/ATTORNEY GENERAL 28 ‘SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1 (9) Is the Respondent protected under sovereign immunity from violating HIPPA 2 Guidelines regarding the Petitioner and her medical visits and ER visits at Alaska 3 Regional Hospital? : 4 (10) Is the Respondent protected under sovereign immunity when they conducted their own 5 investigation after APD had arrested the Petitioner on July 18, 2018 and concluded that 6 the Petitioner had committed the crime on July 10, 2018 when the Petitioner was an ER 7 patient at Alaska Regional Hospital and not on July 12, 2018? 8 (11) Alaska Regional Hospital Employee Georgianna Yonuschot submitted an affidavit and 9 4-page timeline to FBI Agent Derek Despelland approximately 20 days after the charges 10 were dismissed against the Petitioner. Georgianna Yonuschot stated that the Petitioner 1] was seen on July 10, 2018 and was released without incident. How did the Respondent 12 conclude that the Petitioner had committed the crime on July 10, 2018 after they 13 conducted their own investigation and yet Alaska Regional Hospital Employee 14 Georgianna Yonuschot stated in her 4-page timeline that the Petitioner was released 15 without incident? 16 (12) Is the Respondent protected under sovereign immunity when there is corruption ~ 17 involved? 18 (13)1s the Respondent legally allowed to conduct their own investigation on a private citizen 19 after law enforcement (APD) arrests the private citizen? 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 PAGE MULLIGAN VS, STATE OF ALASKA/ATTORNEY GENERAL 28 ‘SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES QUESTIONS PRESENTED JURISDICTION [ ] For cases from federal courts: The date on which the United States Court of Appeals decided my case was [ ] No petition for rehearing was timely filed in my case. [ ] A timely petition for rehearing was denied by the United States Court of Appeals on the following date: _»__, and a copy of the order denying rehearing appears at