Whether the 14th Amendment imposes upon the States of Louisiana the obligation to refrain from systemic, purposeful deprivations of substantive federal constitutional rights

QUESTIONS PRESENTED | I. | Whether the 14% Amendment, imposes upon the States of Louisiana the obligation to refrain from systemic, purposeful deprivations of substantive federal constitutional nghts, as a settled matter federal law? th. What impact, if any, does known use of pernured testimony have on the fair | administration of justice in this case and the compliance with substantive 14" | Amendment Protections? | iit. | Whether, when the state court forum condones ineffective assistance of counsel, | at that point, are criminal defendants obligated to fend for themselves or do they have substantive constitutional standing to demand that the State Court forum : conform to the mandates of the 6" Amendment or else no conviction can be had? : IV. | Whether the State of Louisiana can cherry-pick when it conforms with substantive | Federal Constitutional Protections? Or Whether it can choose to disregard them at | will knowing no superior federal court will intervene to preserve the Supremacy | of the Federal Constitution? v. Whether the Federal Constitution, prohibits the State of Louisiana from enforcing its manufactured Judicial Orders for maintaining the “forced” physical custody of William Baham under the auspices of an imposed sentence wherein all were secured in violation of substantive protections which no state can legally abridge, _ diminish, nor disregard? | Whether deprivations of the Right of Confrontation results in a violation of | substantive Due Process and substantive Equal protection as provided for in the | 14" Amendment? | Vor. | : Pursuant the substantive nature of 6" and 14" Amendments, does a person have a ; | : right to defend themselves against criminal accusations by way of placing before | the trial jury DNA and GSR expert witnesses on his own behalf? : | | , | | + . | | | Tn pos ¥.