Mark Marvin v. Martha Peldunas, et al.
JusticiabilityDoctri
Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that the state agency can require future social-security recipients to prematurely apply for reduced benefits in contradiction to federal statute
QUESTION PRESENTED WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS ERRED WHEN IT HELD THAT THE STATE AGENCY CAN REQUIRE THAT FUTURE SOCIAL ~ SECURITY RECIPIENTS PREMATURELY APPLY FOR REDUCED BENEFITS IN CLEAR CONTRADICTION TO UNITED STATES . STATUTE WHICH PROHIBITS SUCH PRACTICE? . JURISDICTION The Court of Appeals denied my appeal on June 14, 2022 and " rehearing was denied August 05, 2022. This Court has jurisdiction under , 28 U.S.C. 1254. This Court has supervisory authority over courts below. CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS : ’ Petitioner cites violations of the Fifth Amendment as applied under the Fourteenth Amendment, and the Supremacy Clause. :