No. 22-5585

Mark Marvin v. Martha Peldunas, et al.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2022-09-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment social-security statutory-interpretation supremacy-clause
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-11-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that the state agency can require future social-security recipients to prematurely apply for reduced benefits in contradiction to federal statute

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS ERRED WHEN IT HELD THAT THE STATE AGENCY CAN REQUIRE THAT FUTURE SOCIAL ~ SECURITY RECIPIENTS PREMATURELY APPLY FOR REDUCED BENEFITS IN CLEAR CONTRADICTION TO UNITED STATES . STATUTE WHICH PROHIBITS SUCH PRACTICE? . JURISDICTION The Court of Appeals denied my appeal on June 14, 2022 and " rehearing was denied August 05, 2022. This Court has jurisdiction under , 28 U.S.C. 1254. This Court has supervisory authority over courts below. CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS : ’ Petitioner cites violations of the Fifth Amendment as applied under the Fourteenth Amendment, and the Supremacy Clause. :

Docket Entries

2022-11-07
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/4/2022.
2022-10-13
Waiver of right of respondent Martha Peldunas, et al. to respond filed.
2022-09-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 17, 2022)

Attorneys

Mark Marvin
Mark Marvin — Petitioner
Mark Marvin — Petitioner
Martha Peldunas, et al.
Matthew Joseph NothnagleOrange County Attorney's Off., Respondent
Matthew Joseph NothnagleOrange County Attorney's Off., Respondent