Whether the affirmation of the Appellant Court (that it was proper for trial court to deny Fine's Motions for judgment of Acquittal) was correct

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether the affirmation of the Appellant Court (that it was proper for trial court to deny Fine's Motions for judgment of Acquittal) was correct. IJ. Whether the affirmation of the Appellant Court that it was proper for the trial court to deny Fine's motion to suppress in part and allow illegally obtained evidence to be used was correct. III. Whether the affirmation of the Appellant Court (that the trial Court didn’t abuse its discretion in admitting hearsay documents) was correct. IV. Whether any or all of Florida State Statutes 893.135.C1, 893.1C1b, 893.135.1¢1, 893.13.6a and 499.03.3 are constitutionally vague and therefore violate due process under the 14" Amendment. V. Whether any or all of the punishments for violating state law statutes 893.135.cl, 893.135.1clb, . 893.135.1c1, 893.13.6a and 499.03.3 violate Constitutional Amendments VIII and XIV. VI. Whether the State Minimum Mandatory laws violate Constitutional Amendments VIII and XIV. VII. Whether the totality of the State's failure to provide due process by allowing Constitutional violations and unlawful behavior by officials (concerning Ms. Fine's case), constitutes it being vacated completely and immediately.