Whether a plaintiff alleging a violation of § 1202(b) is required to demonstrate that the defendant's "intentional[] remov[al] or alter[ation]" of CMI "conveyed in connection with copies of [the plaintiff's] work" was connected, linked or associated in some identifiable way to known instances of infringement, even though the plain language of the statute contains no such requirement.

Whether a plaintiff alleging a violation of § 1202(b) is required to demonstrate that the defendant's 'intentional[] remov[al] or alter[ation]' of CMI 'conveyed in connection with copies of [the plaintiff's] work' was connected, linked or associated in some identifiable way to known instances of infringement, even though the plain language of the statute contains no such requirement