No. 22-5593

Richard Anthony Rodriguez v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2022-09-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: apprendi-rule constitutional-procedure criminal-procedure due-process jury-trial jury-trial-right juvenile-adjudication prior-conviction-exception prior-convictions sentencing-enhancement sentencing-enhancements sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-10-14
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether juvenile adjudications obtained without a trial by jury can be used to enhance a defendant's sentence in a later proceeding

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

question presented is whether it is constitutionally permissible to use a prior juvenile adjudication to enhance a sentence regardless of whether the juvenile had a right to a jury trial in that prior proceeding? -iii

Docket Entries

2022-10-17
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/14/2022.
2022-09-27
Waiver of right of respondent State of California to respond filed.
2022-09-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 17, 2022)

Attorneys

Richard Anthony Rodriguez
Laura P. GordonLaura P. Gordon Att. at Law, Petitioner
Laura P. GordonLaura P. Gordon Att. at Law, Petitioner
State of California
R. Todd MarshallCalif. Dept. of Justice, Respondent
R. Todd MarshallCalif. Dept. of Justice, Respondent