No. 22-5593
Richard Anthony Rodriguez v. California
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: apprendi-rule constitutional-procedure criminal-procedure due-process jury-trial jury-trial-right juvenile-adjudication prior-conviction-exception prior-convictions sentencing-enhancement sentencing-enhancements sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess FourthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-10-14
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether juvenile adjudications obtained without a trial by jury can be used to enhance a defendant's sentence in a later proceeding
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented is whether it is constitutionally permissible to use a prior juvenile adjudication to enhance a sentence regardless of whether the juvenile had a right to a jury trial in that prior proceeding? -iii
Docket Entries
2022-10-17
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/14/2022.
2022-09-27
Waiver of right of respondent State of California to respond filed.
2022-09-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 17, 2022)
Attorneys
Richard Anthony Rodriguez
Laura P. Gordon — Laura P. Gordon Att. at Law, Petitioner
Laura P. Gordon — Laura P. Gordon Att. at Law, Petitioner
State of California
R. Todd Marshall — Calif. Dept. of Justice, Respondent
R. Todd Marshall — Calif. Dept. of Justice, Respondent