No. 22-5599
Denzell Russell v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review circuit-court-split circuit-split criminal-procedure due-process federal-criminal-procedure federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure judicial-interpretation plain-error plain-error-review standard-of-review statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-10-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is the Sixth Circuit's application of plain-error-review under Fed.-R.-Crim.-P.-52(b) in conflict with this Court's decisions?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Is the Sixth Circuit’s application of plain error review under Fed. R. Crim. P. 52(b) in conflict with this Court’s decisions? 2. Have the courts of appeals erred in reconfiguring plain error under Fed. R. Crim. P. 52(b) to extend to the government when the history of the plain error doctrine and this Court’s decisions suggest it was only ever intended to protect defendants?
Docket Entries
2022-10-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.
2022-09-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-09-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 17, 2022)
2022-07-15
Application (22A26) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until September 23, 2022.
2022-07-05
Application (22A26) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 25, 2022 to September 23, 2022, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
Attorneys
Denzell Russell
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent