No. 22-5600
Quincetta Y. Cargill v. Alabama, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: affidavit-of-bias appellate-review civil-rights counsel-ineffectiveness due-process judicial-discretion judicial-misconduct motion-denial personal-jurisdiction recusal standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2022-10-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court judge's failure to disclose and respond to the petitioner's affidavit of personal bias and prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 144 and 455 was an abuse of discretion
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : eee eee
Docket Entries
2022-10-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.
2022-10-12
Waiver of right of respondent Alabama, et al. to respond filed.
2022-08-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 17, 2022)
Attorneys
Alabama, et al.
Marc Alan Starrett — Alabama Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Marc Alan Starrett — Alabama Attorney General's Office, Respondent