Whether the state court's denial of the defendant's motion to dismiss for pre-arrest delay violated the defendant's due process rights

No question identified. : WHETHER A (15) FIFTEEN YEAR PREARREST DELAY WHERE THE | PROSECUTOR COULD NOT GIVE A SUFFICEINT REASON FOR THE DELAY. . TO JUSTIFY THE PREJUDICE TO THE PETITIONER WAS A DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS AND WAS THE PETITIONER EGREGIOUSLY DENIED ; : EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF TRIAL COUNSEL AND APPELLATE COUNSEL WHEN THEY FAILED TO ARGUE SUBSTANTIAL AND ACTUAL PREJUDICE ‘ AND CONCEDED THAT THE STATE DID NOT INTEND TO GAIN A TACTICAL ADVANTAGE BY THE DELAY. US CONST. AM V, VI, XIV: CONST. 1963 ART. 1 8§17, 20. |