No. 22-5611

William A. White v. Department of Justice, et al.

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2022-09-19
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-rights constitutional-provisions disclosure due-process freedom-of-information-act judicial-review legal-jurisdiction public-interest standing statutory-provisions
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference: 2022-11-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Seven Circus eXia Riding, Phe ony perseas' FOIA disclosure obstructions 'greatly Comfounded' under 5 USC 552(a)(4)(B) could be justified based upon perceived public interest in the disclosure sought the requested FOIA records

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , ) O Dia te Sereth Circus eX ia Riding, Phe ony perseas” cca Xe Cecchrat AiSclesure obseconks “qrematly Com Fedenduoeuies vader SUSC SSSTIALI VAY Gad S USC 6552 LANLBY COG) coud be Krvted based Lafen Perceived, Publ\c interest (An the disclosure Sotned Hee Ceguesteds ASL NES eee aot Preduicd dung Yhe Pequest” ey (he Kime? Q Dd the Seven Circa erin Sindiacy Yreva Fou Peg wes Per Cen pre bely Yow hencegh Sees aad Cosss, extn Lines Nwey quads Sremally prenen\, Vase dS Lone Dercemied Vecle ok pov iatcereak pa Pee. Pequestes records?

Docket Entries

2022-11-14
Petition DENIED
2022-11-14
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2022-10-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/10/2022.
2022-10-19
Waiver of right of respondent Department of Justice, et al. to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2022-01-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 19, 2022)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionProof of ServiceAppendixMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionProof of ServiceAppendix

Attorneys

Department of Justice, et al.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
William White
William A. White — Petitioner
William A. White — Petitioner