Where the Tenth Circuit Court anchines the district court's (06) failure to address the plaintiff's rebuttal of the presumption of receipt of court orders, causing the dismissal of the case

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Where the Tenth Circus Cour! $ anchines the Otret Coors (06) Failure fo address He Aamtihs rebuttal of the ere Sumption of pecier} Cob Courls orders), CauSing He Pssmissal — a the Lose. The Glainks 6 rales weer the Tunth Cir Cowts Standard of Law established in “Ul Ve doaswov Etecess, 136 F.3d MAH there He Tenth Cir specifically culed » when Mr. Witt Gted on Atiibovit ddenting ceviee! of Oocuments, the AFFdavit was enough to creale a cebuttal of presumption of reciept and Ahak te District Cort enrored m igrorng me witt Affidavit. Did The Tenth Cir. Court enter a Dicision Conlict with He Shoada(s hey established in MH", aller dhe OL Fils a Abkisavid (creating « rebuttal fo the presomprion of cexiept of (ort or bers, whith the Dabect lor gored JE Wheashor the tenth Cir. fourt eagerly Jehermind the Fssvets) A taint carsed the 0-4. motion $0 Alter Subgeneat were not extrodinary FsSues wWarrenting relick and T4 the Tenth Cir. Court properly Selecmined dhe [lacked Sucisdic kon to ofinidn 2% buts) Aaintill cased Conceraing Aepetntrent of Counsel and Stay of Loart proceeding: See Attaches Areendix (A) and (B) and (C) and (DO) and (E} and (77 (A) |