No. 22-5633

James Blessing v. Nick Hoffman, et al.

Lower Court: New Jersey
Docketed: 2022-09-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment administrative-action communication-ban constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection liberty property property-rights slander
Key Terms:
DueProcess FirstAmendment
Latest Conference: 2022-11-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should two lower-level administrators be permitted to sabotage an appellant by banning them from all communication with the court without due process?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Question Presented (#.1) Without any due process nor hearing, should two lower level administrators be premitted to sabatoge an Appellant throughout the lower Court by banning him FOREVER FROM ALL EMAILS, FAXES, TEPEHONE CALLS, AND 95 % OF WRITING, SUCH THAT THIS SEVERE LIBEL AND SLANDER SPREAD TO THE APPELLATE | JUDGES WHO THEN DISREGARDED THE WRITTEN CONTRACT, WHICH IS THE VERY BASIS FOR THIS CASE. | Should the above overly harsh punishments be allowed, when the Petitioner ONLY politely requested with evidence a hearing into possible perjury by a clerk, and left a polite PRAYER on phone voice mail to "let God decide." All I did do was’to say a politg Prayer on voice mail and request a hearing and I am banned for life from nearly all lower Court communications with MY PROPERTY TAKEN FROM ME. ALL MY CASE MANAGERS ARE TAKEN FROM ME FOREVER, THEIR KNOWLEDGE AND GUIDANCE IS PERMANENTLY TAKEN WITHOUT ANY DUE PROCESS . Constitution This is in violation of the 14th Amendment, Section 1 "nor shall any State deprive any person of . . . liberty or property, without due process of law, nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." i | : Question Presented (# 2) There is an industry wide adhesion monopoly Contract practice in the book publishing world. Citizens of the United States of America are forced to do these book publishing adhesion contracts compelling them to’ .agree to no Jury’trial with any and all. disputes with the book company; in this particular case, the original publishing . contract does not even state that the author is: giving up his or her.right to Jury trial for the dispute. Should this industry wide bo;ok publishing contract adhesion practice be permitted to continue. Many citizens would like. to be free of adhesion contracts. These monoply adhesion Contracts violate the Seventh Amendment of the Constituion of the Untied States of America in that According to the Seventh Amendment, "the right to a trial by Jury shall be preserved. Should such industry wide (Book publishing) Contracts be limited to permit more Jury trials in Civil matters? ii

Docket Entries

2022-11-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/18/2022.
2022-09-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 20, 2022)

Attorneys

James Blessing
James Blessing — Petitioner
James Blessing — Petitioner