No. 22-5635
Vladimir Vladimirovic Brik v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: brady-violation civil-rights due-process federal-procedure gatekeeping-provision habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance material-evidence second-petition successive-petition
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-10-14
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court of appeals erred in affirming the dismissal of petitioner's material Brady claim as 'second or successive' under §2255(h)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : , QUESTION: PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Are second-in-time petitions raising newly discovered material Brady violations "second or seccessive” within the meaning of §2255(h)'s gatekeeping provision? (i)
Docket Entries
2022-10-17
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/14/2022.
2022-09-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-09-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 21, 2022)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Vladimir Vladimirovic Brik
Vladimir Vladimirovic Brik — Petitioner
Vladimir Vladimirovic Brik — Petitioner