No. 22-5638

Hector Martinez-Robos v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-09-21
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: controlled-substances criminal-procedure jury-instructions mandatory-minimum-sentences mens-rea plain-error sentencing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-10-28
Related Cases: 22-5693 (Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

whether-instructional-error-is-plain

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether an instructional error is “plain” for purposes of Fed. R. Crim. P. 52(b) when the charge to the jury is erroneous under an opinion of this Court interpreting an identical term in a related statute. 2. Whether the knowingly mens rea in 21 U.S.C. § 960 applies to the type and quantity of controlled substance involved in the offense when those elements are used to establish mandatory minimum and enhanced maximum sentences. i STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES ° United States v. Hector Martinez-Robos, No. 19CR0369-DMS, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California. Judgment entered July 27, 2020. . United States v. Hector Martinez-Robos, No. 20-50205, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Judgment entered June 24, 2022. il

Docket Entries

2022-10-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.
2022-09-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2022-09-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 21, 2022)

Attorneys

Hector Martinez-Robos
Benjamin Lee ColemanBenjamin L. Coleman Law PC, Petitioner
Benjamin Lee ColemanBenjamin L. Coleman Law PC, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent