Jay Eugene Reed v. United States
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Has the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit violated the Fifth and Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution by allowing an insufficient Charging Instrument to be used to Convict and Sentence a citizen of the United States?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Has the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit violated the Fifth and Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution by allowing an insufficient Charging Instrument to be used to Convict and Sentence a citizen of the United States? Has the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit failed to take into account Mr. Reed's age, disabilities, and lack : of criminal history in a substantively unreasonable sentence by treating Mr. :Reed as a subclass of offender, the worst of offenders in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments? Has the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit failed to consider Mr. Reed was ill-prepared to understand the advice of counsel due to lack of legal knowledge, fear and misplaced ; trust in violation of the Sixth Amendment? , Has the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit violated Mr. Reed's Fifth Amendment rights of due process by not ; considering the expert testimony of a renowned, published psychiatrist? -~ ii Stee