Whether the trial court and the court of criminal appeals erred by neglecting to address the amended ground in the findings of facts and conclusions of law

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Conveyed Pace Mince assistance of Counsel claim for being Misint (on . ays . nd identi€sed hewecinn : ON nok discovery Showed thet poli@ officers positively Ak pun; ' . ene OfEicer Kati Snell Lestified that neither officers invelved in Porn a ail Yerrocly identified them selves, Contvadicting the very plecdng i te trial Counsel John Young USkd to persuade Me. Caseg into hed Counsels mig representecion of the Racks of the Evidency within “he nl Can be Confirmed Ehvough trical Counsels habeas Affidavit. . i$ specific Ground was arqued in the “Amended Writ of heloecs CovpuS, im THE Case Lys presents the Po ttowing questions. ay id Uy trial Court pnd the court of Crimingl nppeals Err boy neglecting te E8S tho Amended Cyound in the Findings of facts and conclusions of Law? a ie the Tevicwing Court Adequately Addressed the Amended qrourd should the. 2 Da on Granked relief dup te plea loeing tavolumtary for mis advice ? nes Peviewing Court Properly Apply Strickland to tho Amended Ground a ‘ ee GS All the claims of +. AC in the oviginal writ 2 ‘ohuate to evel found erroneous Advicg of trial Counsel MBAversilo le Error wh fendaut it Ji At punishment Phase ¢ : on Aeendea Admits 0 Guilt | Question) Pr. sented V\r. Casey {\\so Alleged in Wis W.07 Writ of helecs Corpus tee ‘Loonsel Gros opperating Under a Potential Conflict of interes From being indicted on Several Lelonears Chovqes in Which he Was Leder Loond quilty. trial Coonsel had Mv. Casey Sign A Waiter of Conflict Cree ; Counsel after Signing the Quilty plea admonishments Giving ) UP is lth and (4 amendment right to jury viel. TEN the trial courts response to My, Casey's Application Lor weit of Naloens Corpus (see,