William L. Whipple v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida
DueProcess FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Can mandamus be deemed as a substitute for appeal when litigant was denied equal access to court and deprived of his due process right to reserve issues for appeal
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. | CAN MANDAMUS BE DEEMED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR APPEAL WHEN LITIGANT WAS DENIED EQUAL ACCESS TO COURT AND DEPRIVED OF HIS DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO RESERVE ISSUES FOR APPEAL 2. SHOULD THE DISTRICT COURT JUDGE’S ORDERS BE VACATED WHEREIN HE FAILED TO PERFORM HIS MINISTERIAL DUTY TO CONSIDER PETITIONER’S WRITTEN OBJECTIONS AND RULE 7 MOTION TO THE MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS WHICH DEPRIVED PETITIONER OF HIS RIGHT TO APPEAL THE ORDERS AND DE NOVO DETERMINATION | ii