No. 22-5658

William L. Whipple v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2022-09-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appeal appeal-rights civil-procedure due-process equal-access judicial-review mandamus ministerial-duty standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2022-11-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can mandamus be deemed as a substitute for appeal when litigant was denied equal access to court and deprived of his due process right to reserve issues for appeal

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. | CAN MANDAMUS BE DEEMED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR APPEAL WHEN LITIGANT WAS DENIED EQUAL ACCESS TO COURT AND DEPRIVED OF HIS DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO RESERVE ISSUES FOR APPEAL 2. SHOULD THE DISTRICT COURT JUDGE’S ORDERS BE VACATED WHEREIN HE FAILED TO PERFORM HIS MINISTERIAL DUTY TO CONSIDER PETITIONER’S WRITTEN OBJECTIONS AND RULE 7 MOTION TO THE MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS WHICH DEPRIVED PETITIONER OF HIS RIGHT TO APPEAL THE ORDERS AND DE NOVO DETERMINATION | ii

Docket Entries

2022-11-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/18/2022.
2022-09-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 24, 2022)
2022-08-18
Application (22A155) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until September 20, 2022.
2022-08-10
Application (22A155) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 21, 2022 to October 20, 2022, submitted to Justice Thomas.

Attorneys

William L. Whipple
William Whipple — Petitioner
William Whipple — Petitioner