Who owns the Dollar General Stores corporation?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . 1) Who owns the Dollar General Stores corporation? 2) Did ‘the AUSA investigate who owns that franchise that was claiming to haveibeen robbed? , . ; 3) What was the source of the merchandise for sale in that Dollar GEneral store? : . 4)Do you judges each expect to be particularly described on any warrant or wauld , you accept any name that accuses you that wasnot your proper name? ~ 5)Do you judges really believe that you can deny Roney, Sr. his sovereignty but still claim you are sovereign? , . 6)Does a man's signature reflect his sovereignty? . | 7)Daid Cogburn, Jr's statement in his opinion that ME Coleman, counsel, was acting as the Att'y for the government as he specifically stated, as 18USC4241(a)only ; allows the Attorney for the government to move for that evaluation {Civil action suit] psychological exam on @1-2016 as per 4241(a) if lawful, only allows. that one ' or the judge in the criminal ‘action to’move for such examination but existing law ; states that Damny T. Roney, Sr. was involved in a criminal proceeding when the (civil action suit] was never filed Against him nor could it be so filed then per , Nov. i, 1909 Kaufman v Garner CCWDKY 173F550; therefore, Roney's counsel was not his counsel.;.but the Attorney for the government? . 8)Cogburn, JR. cited the Strickland v.Wash, controversy test for the allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel, illegally as the SCOTUS wrote it, citing the conditions of judgment but fey ‘cannot do that as the COngress muSt do ot as per the , ConstituTion's pRovision in Att. 3, sect. 2, Cl. 1 with such exceptions.as Cong , ress shall make.; What is the proper citation to refer to as the SCOTUS can only judge an act lawful / unlawful, not set conditigns by which they judge such acts? " 9) WHy did a BuNCombe COunty Deputy follow a motorist exercising his/her contract rights that the State cannot impair by any law ang Guarantees that one to enforce in the courts by the federal Constitution's provision Art. t, sect. 10, cl,i1, as valid contracts are property in the Fourteenth Amendment nor shall prévate property . ; be taken for public use without just compensation} June 14, 1934 Lynch v US 290US , 571 54Sct840 78Led1434, So, how did that cop justify violating the motorist's contract rights on her own privately contracted property. that the State guarantees. © to her after the cop did trespass on the law and her rights as well as her property? 3 yifi 2Led6Q No government official can have discretien to commit uncon : stitutional or illegal acts. ae : ( os 9A (19) Ha Ws DL ROMEY, Se EIN URE TH MESES SERN HERE OR Wie K-49 STREMEMT IAS. IE LRLL [HOSE WERE REDACTED AMD MO KF STREAM WAS LENCE lee DAE THE KD 206: NS. A POLICE OFFICER, Wie was THE Docs ware | STATEMENT OF EVENS. OF TRU, JOB AS PER TUE barat PINESDINENLT'S LCOBLPROMT THE WITNESSES CLAUSE PER Bal Gssshiee AS. 10 FACE RTO FICE. COMPRONTDTIOM, IO SUBSTLTUTES FOR THEM? _. @) WHERE DID THE ROBBER. WAT PAIS. GO AETER HIS ACT OE ROBBERY 2 ——@B._WAS.0..P. SHMWUELS, Te WEARING PANTS. UPOA BEING: RIDAALPED BL, RAPER. ON. JM13, 2016? —-@D_WAS.D..T_ ROME YS WEARING LAI PANTS WHEN SEIZED ON PRUE _—_ PROPERTY WITHOUT. WARREAIT ON TAU, 26a? _—_.@Y) ACCORDING. 1 THE WITNESSES VISURL_L..O, OETHE ROBBER,,.WHEDIDANY OFTHE, IDENTIFY AS THE ROBBER WHTTND PANTS 2 9) HAD 1 COUR PPPONITED COUNSEL NOT ABANOCMED D, To ROME, Sty a WOULD T_ KONE, St. HAVE ELECTED. [0.60.10 TRIGL, OR DLO THAT GOUNSEL ee SEND DT. ROMNEY, Se TO KEN TUCK WHERE FE COURT LOSTALL FORMS. OF _ TUS DICTION. OVER THE. CRIMINAL.ASE 2 (AO) ETE. COUR APPOINTED COUNSEL HAD SECURED, THE WITNESSES. SoHE = MENTS. FR ROME, 5C_TO.READ, INOULD ROMES, St HAVE. CHOSEN TB 0.10. wane TRIAL EME HAD HSCWNOETHELNG PANTS BORGER [ Wits WORE BLUE JEANS LOR WAS. HALON SEL INEFFECTIVE 2 —. —.@D)_DID THE 18. DELAYS. OF A SPEED LTRIRL.CHUSED.B4 THEL (OUR ARUMTED COUNSEL. PREJUDICE THE RIGHT. T0. CONFRONT THE WITMESSES, THEREFORE DID THOSE. DELAYS. PROVE INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE