No. 22-5664
Wayne Carl Nicolaison v. Minnesota
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights due-process judicial-modification medical-records mental-health statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-11-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the alteration of the receiving hospital report by Judge Burke as mandated by Minn. Stat. § 253B.12 (1990) violate substantive law?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . DID THE ALTERATION OF THE RECEIVING HOSPTIAL REPORT BY JUDGE BURKE AS MANDATED BY MINN. STAT. § 253B.12 (1990) VIOLATE SUBSTANTIVE LAW?
Docket Entries
2022-11-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/18/2022.
2022-10-20
Waiver of right of respondent State of Minnesota to respond filed.
2022-08-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 24, 2022)
Attorneys
State of Minnesota
Matthew D. Hough — Hennepin County Attorney's Office, Respondent
Matthew D. Hough — Hennepin County Attorney's Office, Respondent